rd13_copilot_setup/git-templates/.github/copilot-instructions.md
Conrad Schulz 95d03603cf fix: history/prompts/ is committed, not gitignored
Full agent conversation history is preserved in git.
Only data/ remains gitignored (persistent service data).
2026-05-31 12:51:15 +00:00

4.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

GitHub Copilot Project Instructions

Project

Stack

  • Language:
  • Framework:
  • Database:
  • Infrastructure:

Architecture

  • Pattern (MVC / Hexagonal / Event-driven / ...):
  • Key constraints:
  • ADR location: docs/adr/

Project Structure Conventions

Persistent Data (/data/)

  • Alle persistenten Service-Daten gehören in /data/<service-name>/ (Repo-Root)
  • Nie Daten-Dateien committen /data/ ist vollständig gitignored
  • Einen Unterordner pro Service (z.B. data/postgres/, data/redis/, data/uploads/)
  • Erforderliche Unterordner in docs/ADMIN.md dokumentieren

Agent History (/history/)

  • Vollständige Konversationenhistory/prompts/YYYY-MM-DD_beschreibung.md (committed vollständige History bleibt erhalten)
  • Komprimierter Kontexthistory/summary/PROJECT_CONTEXT.md (committed, immer aktuell halten!)
  • Beim Start einer neuen Session: history/summary/PROJECT_CONTEXT.md zuerst lesen
  • Am Ende jeder Session: beide Dateien committen
  • Copilot Chat: /history → History loggen + Summary aktualisieren

Documentation (3 Zielgruppen alle 3 müssen existieren)

Datei Zielgruppe Inhalt
docs/USER.md Endnutzer Features, How-To, FAQ keine technischen Details
docs/ADMIN.md Administratoren Deployment, Konfiguration, Monitoring, Backup
docs/MAINTAINER.md Entwickler Architektur, ADRs, Konventionen, Erweiterung

Regel: Jede bedeutende Änderung muss mindestens eine dieser Dateien aktualisieren. Der pre-commit Hook prüft dies automatisch.

Conventions

  • Branch naming: feat/<ticket>-description, fix/<ticket>-description
  • Commit format: Conventional Commits (feat|fix|chore|docs|refactor|test|ci)
  • File structure:
  • Naming:

Engineering Process

Before starting any task

  1. Clarify requirements user story + acceptance criteria vorhanden?
  2. Impact analysis welche bestehenden Komponenten sind betroffen?
  3. Architecture check passt die geplante Lösung zur bestehenden Architektur?
  4. Test strategy wie wird das Feature getestet?

Definition of Ready (DoR)

A task can only be started when:

  • Acceptance criteria are clear and unambiguous
  • Non-functional requirements defined (performance, security, scalability)
  • Architectural approach agreed upon
  • No unresolved external blockers

Definition of Done (DoD)

A task is only done when ALL of the following are true:

  • Code implements the acceptance criteria
  • Unit tests written and passing
  • Integration tests (where applicable) passing
  • No linter / type errors
  • No secrets or credentials in code
  • OWASP Top 10 reviewed
  • Relevant documentation updated: docs/USER.md and/or docs/ADMIN.md and/or docs/MAINTAINER.md
  • Alle 3 Zielgruppen-Dokumente vorhanden (docs/USER.md, docs/ADMIN.md, docs/MAINTAINER.md)
  • Persistente Daten liegen ausschließlich in /data/<service>/ (nie woanders)
  • history/summary/PROJECT_CONTEXT.md aktualisiert
  • Commit message follows Conventional Commits
  • No dead code, no TODOs left behind (or tracked as issues)
  • pre-commit Quality Gate bestanden (oder Bypass bewusst begründet)

Testing Strategy

  • Framework:
  • Coverage target: ≥ 80% (critical paths: 100%)
  • Test pyramid: unit > integration > e2e
  • Test location: tests/ mirroring source structure

Security

  • No secrets in code or config files use environment variables
  • Validate all inputs at system boundaries
  • Principle of least privilege for all permissions
  • Dependency vulnerabilities: check before adding new deps

Documentation Standards

  • Code comments: explain WHY, not WHAT
  • Public APIs: always documented
  • Architecture decisions: write ADR in docs/adr/ (template: docs/adr/000-template.md)
  • CHANGELOG.md: update with every release
  • 3-Zielgruppen-Regel: USER.md (Endnutzer) + ADMIN.md (Ops) + MAINTAINER.md (Dev) immer alle 3 pflegen

Non-Functional Requirements

  • Response time:
  • Availability:
  • Data retention: